If someone would have asked me last
week how long distance education had been around, I probably would have
answered about 40 years. I remember as a
young child being in my elementary school classrooms and watching educational television
and thinking how neat it was to be taught by someone other than my teacher standing
in front of me. I sat and listened
earnestly as the television teacher, as I had called her, would talk and
demonstrate the lesson for the week and looked forward to my weekly TV learning. I can remember looking in matchbook covers
and finding the advertisements for this course or that course, and I had not
remembered that little fact until Dr. Simonson mentioned it in our media course
(Laureate Education, n.d.). Back in my childhood, my mind could not even
fathom taking a class or for that matter an entire degree on the computer. At that time, computers were in a fantasy
world, and the World Wide Web was about 15 years away. Once the educational television programs
disappeared, there was very little in the way of distance learning that was
presented to me. I traveled along the
academic path in traditional school settings.
My professional career had smatterings of distance learning in the way
of video presentations, but that was all.
It was not until I joined with my current employer that the world of
distance learning began to open up. But
even within the distant learning space inside of my organization, that has
morphed and changed over the years. What
once was done in a classroom setting, has now transformed into online or e-learning. What once was simple PowerPoint leanings,
has evolved into sophisticated multimedia presentations.
My definition of distance learning prior
to beginning at Walden University would have been any learning done in the absence
of an in person teacher, either formal or informal learning. I would have classified watching a YouTube
clip as distance learning, along with pod casts, tapes, and videos. While distance learning is not self-study, it
is formal education in which the learner is separated by geography, and
possibly time, but linked through technology (Simonson, M., Smaldino, S.,
Albright, M., & Zvacek, S., 2012, p. 33)
As you look back over the history of
distance learning, and the changes in format and delivery, there is a definite
correlation with technology, and I feel that is one of the biggest drivers of
change in distance learning. From the
early beginnings with the mail service, to the telegraphy, radio, television,
telephone, VCR, satellite, modems and, the Web, learning at a distance has evolved
to what we have today. Because technology is always changing, distance
learning has had to adapt. Prior to the
computer and the Web, much of the distance learning was one directional. Either by radio or television, the learner listened
or watched and learned from that medium.
Today, technology has allowed multi-layered communication not just with
one person, but with people around the entire globe. No longer is a class restricted to the number
of seats in a particular room. Technology has allowed an interactivity that
would not have been possible just 20 years ago (Sherry, L., 1996). Today
distance learning is growing exponentially (Laureate Education, n.d.). In a
techno driven society, learners can learn just about anywhere and on
anything. Smartphones, tables and PC’s
make distance learning more available than ever before. Delivery method though is just one
change. There has been a large shift
from just delivering information to teaching material for understanding.
In my professional career, I have
noticed a much larger emphasis on the evaluation piece in distance learning. How
does one know that the learner actually understood and extracted the intended
learning objectives? Huett et al.
indicated that it wasn't enough to just repackage a classroom lesson into a
media driven lesson (Moller, L., Foshay, W., & Huett, J., 2008, p. 67).
The whole approach to learning and teaching has to be carefully designed to
ensure that learning does take place. My
employer has moved more to a problem based learning solution for teaching and
training, and it has made tremendous strides in filling in the knowledge
gap. Much like Walden’s approach, the
information is not spoon fed to the class participants. Learners have to go out and find the
information, thereby creating the stronger bonds of learning. This is a huge paradigm shift in our
corporate culture. This methodology has definitely
shaped my view of distance learning and its effectiveness.
My revised definition of distance
learning is the use of technology to bridge distance and time between
instructor and student while participating in a structured learning event. My vision for the future of distance learning
is a bright one. I see corporate
cultures moving away from the classroom based learning environment. It makes complete sense from a cost
perspective, and a portability perspective.
As advances in technology help to drive down costs, I see more and more
mobile devices being used for learning, not just in schools, but also in
business education settings. No longer
will employees have to sit in a cubicle.
Remote work and remote learning will become more popular. With the growth of distance learning, I see
the field of ID also growing to accommodate the needs of primary, secondary and
corporate education to make sure that courses present knowledge in such a way
that is enhanced by all of the technological tools available.
Resources
Laureate Education
(Producer). (n.d.). Distance education: The next generation [Video
file]. Retrieved from https://class.waldenu.edu
Moller, L., Foshay, W.,
& Huett, J. (2008). The evolution of distance education: Implications for
instructional design on the potential of the web (Part 2: Higher education).
TechTrends, 52(4), 66-70.
Sherry, L. (1996).
Issues in Distance Learning. International Journal of Educational
Telecommunications, 1 (4), 337-365.
Simonson, M., Smaldino,
S., Albright, M., & Zvacek, S. (2012). Teaching and learning at a
distance: Foundations of distance education (5th ed.) Boston, MA: Pearson.
Heidi,
ReplyDeleteI agree that distance learning has mirrored the continuous development of technology over the years. It would not be possible to do the things that distance learning does if it weren't for the advancements of technology. I also see corporate cultures moving away from the classroom based instruction. However, a part of me considers how this could be a negative thing. There's something about having the presence and excitement of an instructor in front of me that will in no way compare to doing things solely online. Do you believe this shift in instruction will be a positive or a negative?